Skip to content

Add support for bucket retention policies#5534

Merged
tseaver merged 4 commits intomasterfrom
storage-retention_policy-wip
Sep 28, 2018
Merged

Add support for bucket retention policies#5534
tseaver merged 4 commits intomasterfrom
storage-retention_policy-wip

Conversation

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

@tseaver tseaver commented Jun 25, 2018

(Already reviewed in the private repo).

Merge is blocked pending public beta of the feature on the back-end.

@frankyn Please approve the PR once the back-end is ready.

@tseaver tseaver added api: storage Issues related to the Cloud Storage API. do not merge Indicates a pull request not ready for merge, due to either quality or timing. labels Jun 25, 2018
@tseaver tseaver requested a review from frankyn June 25, 2018 18:47
@tseaver tseaver requested a review from theacodes as a code owner June 25, 2018 18:47
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Jun 25, 2018
@frankyn
Copy link
Contributor

frankyn commented Jun 26, 2018

Thanks @tseaver!

@frankyn frankyn mentioned this pull request Aug 6, 2018
Merged
16 tasks
@tseaver tseaver force-pushed the storage-retention_policy-wip branch from 30eed8a to 31b20f3 Compare August 28, 2018 18:35
@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor Author

tseaver commented Aug 28, 2018

Rebased just now to synch with master.

@tseaver tseaver force-pushed the storage-retention_policy-wip branch from 31b20f3 to be2177d Compare September 7, 2018 14:38
@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor Author

tseaver commented Sep 7, 2018

Rebased against current master.

@googlebot
Copy link

googlebot commented Sep 17, 2018

So there's good news and bad news.

👍 The good news is that everyone that needs to sign a CLA (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) have done so. Everything is all good there.

😕 The bad news is that it appears that one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter. We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that here in the pull request.

Note to project maintainer: This is a terminal state, meaning the cla/google commit status will not change from this state. It's up to you to confirm consent of all the commit author(s), set the cla label to yes (if enabled on your project), and then merge this pull request when appropriate.

@googlebot googlebot added cla: no This human has *not* signed the Contributor License Agreement. and removed cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. labels Sep 17, 2018
@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor Author

tseaver commented Sep 17, 2018

Fixing borked rebase now.

@tseaver tseaver force-pushed the storage-retention_policy-wip branch from b0feda4 to c7effc5 Compare September 17, 2018 17:36
@googlebot
Copy link

googlebot commented Sep 17, 2018

CLAs look good, thanks!

@googlebot googlebot added cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. and removed cla: no This human has *not* signed the Contributor License Agreement. labels Sep 17, 2018
@alixhami alixhami removed their request for review September 17, 2018 19:56
@tseaver tseaver added release blocking Required feature/issue must be fixed prior to next release. and removed release blocking Required feature/issue must be fixed prior to next release. labels Sep 25, 2018
@tseaver tseaver added the status: blocked Resolving the issue is dependent on other work. label Sep 25, 2018
@frankyn
Copy link
Contributor

frankyn commented Sep 28, 2018

@tseaver you can now merge and released. I don't have approval powers anymore.

frankyn
frankyn approved these changes Sep 28, 2018
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@frankyn frankyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Spoke to soon!

@tseaver tseaver removed do not merge Indicates a pull request not ready for merge, due to either quality or timing. status: blocked Resolving the issue is dependent on other work. labels Sep 28, 2018
@tseaver tseaver merged commit 0928b8e into master Sep 28, 2018
@tseaver tseaver deleted the storage-retention_policy-wip branch September 28, 2018 20:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@theacodes theacodes Awaiting requested review from theacodes

@dhermes dhermes Awaiting requested review from dhermes

@tswast tswast Awaiting requested review from tswast

1 more reviewer

@frankyn frankyn frankyn approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

api: storage Issues related to the Cloud Storage API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@tseaver @frankyn @googlebot