Merged
Conversation
thaJeztah
approved these changes
Dec 2, 2025
Member
thaJeztah
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM
assuming green once the images are up
Member
|
Failure should hopefully be addressed by #51649 |
These releases include 2 security fixes following the security policy:
- crypto/x509: excessive resource consumption in printing error string for host certificate validation
Within HostnameError.Error(), when constructing an error string, there is no limit to the number of hosts that will be printed out.
Furthermore, the error string is constructed by repeated string concatenation, leading to quadratic runtime.
Therefore, a certificate provided by a malicious actor can result in excessive resource consumption.
HostnameError.Error() now limits the number of hosts and utilizes strings.Builder when constructing an error string.
Thanks to Philippe Antoine (Catena cyber) for reporting this issue.
This is CVE-2025-61729 and Go issue https://go.dev/issue/76445.
- crypto/x509: excluded subdomain constraint does not restrict wildcard SANs
An excluded subdomain constraint in a certificate chain does not restrict the
usage of wildcard SANs in the leaf certificate. For example a constraint that
excludes the subdomain test.example.com does not prevent a leaf certificate from
claiming the SAN *.example.com.
This is CVE-2025-61727 and Go issue https://go.dev/issue/76442.
View the release notes for more information:
https://go.dev/doc/devel/release#go1.25.5
Signed-off-by: Paweł Gronowski <pawel.gronowski@docker.com>
Member
|
Rebased, after #51649 was merged |
kaosagnt
added a commit
to kaosagnt/toolbox2docker
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 4, 2025
Update Go runtime to 1.25.5. moby/moby#51648, docker/cli#6688 Fixes a potential DoS via excessive resource usage when formatting hostname validation errors CVE-2025-61729 Fixes incorrect enforcement of excluded subdomain constraints for wildcard SANs, which could allow improperly trusted certificates CVE-2025-61727
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
These releases include 2 security fixes following the security policy:
crypto/x509: excessive resource consumption in printing error string for host certificate validation
Within HostnameError.Error(), when constructing an error string, there is no limit to the number of hosts that will be printed out.
Furthermore, the error string is constructed by repeated string concatenation, leading to quadratic runtime.
Therefore, a certificate provided by a malicious actor can result in excessive resource consumption.
HostnameError.Error() now limits the number of hosts and utilizes strings.Builder when constructing an error string.
Thanks to Philippe Antoine (Catena cyber) for reporting this issue.
This is CVE-2025-61729 and Go issue https://go.dev/issue/76445.
crypto/x509: excluded subdomain constraint does not restrict wildcard SANs
An excluded subdomain constraint in a certificate chain does not restrict the
usage of wildcard SANs in the leaf certificate. For example a constraint that
excludes the subdomain test.example.com does not prevent a leaf certificate from
claiming the SAN *.example.com.
This is CVE-2025-61727 and Go issue https://go.dev/issue/76442.
View the release notes for more information
- Description for the changelog